| SEQUENZA/21
The Contemporary Classical Music Weekly |
![]() |
![]() |
| Main | Essential Library | Resources | Composer Bios |
| Can
Music Tell a Story Without Words?
By Armando Bayolo Throughout the history of music, musicians and music lovers alike have speculated on the ways in which music is capable (or incapable) of presenting a narrative without reaching much of a conclusion beyond that reached by Hector Berlioz when he admitted that music cannot tell a story without the aid of a verbal program. This has not stopped composers from attempting to pour out their most specific sentiments in their compositions. It is perhaps this sense of thematic ambiguity (knowing that the audience will not know what a work is about without the composer's telling them) so inherent in music that allows composers to feel at ease displaying their deepest feelings in this most public of art forms. And yet many composers attempt to give some sort of clue, whether publicly or privately, as to the nature of a work. Often it is through the use of various clues in the score, whether verbal or musical, clues which Rolland Barthes' calls lexias. These lexias demand from the listener a certain familiarity with other works of art. This in turn is what Robert Hatten defines as intertextuality. Intertextuality
"derives from the view of a literary work as a text whose richness of meaning
results from its location in a potentially infinite network of other texts."
(Hatten, Robert S., "The Place of Intertextuality in Music Studies," American
journal of Semiotics, vol.3, no.4, 1985.) In professor Hatten's argument
a work of art need not quote specifically another work in order for this
phenomenon to take place. Composers have, however, exploited this
phenomenon since time immemorial in order to provide signifiers to the
emotions or even programs developed within their works. This is still the
case today, even amidst the myriad harmonic languages that surround us.
Quotation in particular, even within the context of today's stringent copyright
laws, is a favorite device of composers not only as a
The issue is further complicated today by the proliferation of recorded music and the flourishing of the "music industry." Now more than ever we are faced with an audience exposed to all sorts of music, openly available for purchase in recording and even "pumped" into our systems daily by public address systems at office buildings and shopping malls. Today's composers thus have a greater intertextual palette than in precious times when composers were limited by the amount of music they could personallyexperience in a live setting. Not only that but the advent of electronic recording equipment in the twentieth century has increased the palette even more since composers are no longer limited to quoting melodies but can resort to quoting particular performances by way of electronic reproduction. An example of this is English composer Gavin Bryars' work Jesus' Blood Never Failed Me Yet in which he uses a brief tape of a homeless elderly man in London singing a snippet of the hymn tune of the same name. Jesus' Blood Never Failed Me Yet is a seventy-five minute long extrapolation on this recording consisting of little more than instrumental accompaniments to the recorded "tramp" (as Bryars calls him) performed by various instrumental combinations. Eventually the tramp is "joined" by a live singer (in this case the pop singer Tom Waits) and a chorus which eventually replace him as the recording fades away. Bryars describes his intentions and the genesis of the piece as follows: In 1971, when I was living in London, a friend, Alan Power, was making a
Although the old man died before he could hear what I had done
The Sinking
of the Titanic is, in Bryars' words, an open-ended, almost unfinished work
which he keeps revisiting and revising as new information about the wreck
is discovered (the last revision was done in the late 80s-early 90s in
reaction to the discovery of the wreck in 1985. One wonders if the
recent success of James Cameron's film about the disaster will result
This Episcopal hymn ["Autumn"], then, becomes a basic element of the
In these two works of Bryars' intertextuality results in the religious associations of the melodic material. In the case of The Sinking of the Titanic there are historical associations at a programmatic level as well. Intertextuality results in the second of Gyorgy Ligeti's Three Pieces for Two Pianos, "Self-portrait with Reich and Reilly (and Chopin is in the background)" in a much less self-concious manner and is only a result of the processes set up within its musical structure by the composer. The connections in this work are obvious to anyone who knows who the three composers mentioned in its title are. Chopin, of course, is recognizable to any lover of "classical" music. Reich and Reilly, two pioneers of American Minimalism, are more obscure to the average listener and, appropriately, the connection to their work is more subtle than to Chopin's. The idea behind the piece is that of a broken machine, of "sand in the gears" ( Hausler, Josef [Thomas, John Patrick, trans.] "trompe-l'Oreille, "Allusion, Illusion: concerning some works by Gyrogi Ligeti," notes to Trio fur Violine, Horn und Klavier [Homage a Brahms]/Passacaglia ungherese/Hungarian Rock/ Continuum/ Monument; Selbsportrait; Bewegung" (works by Gyrogi Ligeti), Wergo, wer60110-50, Mainz, 1986.) as it were, resulting from Ligeti's asking the pianists to perform repeated eight-note figures with one hand while depressing certain keys silently with the other. As the eighth-note figures collide with the silent notes a sense of interruption, of incorrectness" is achieved. This in turn is aided by the instruction that the pianists should play as quickly as possible yet independently from each other, bringing to mind the "phasing" techniques of Reilly and, particularly, Reich while remaining harmonically, intellectually and stylistically distinct. At the climax of the piece, Ligeti makes reference, at times literal but often simply by allusion, to the finale of Frederic Chopin's Sonata in b-flat minor, op. 35. The ruling principle in this piece is what Josef Hausler calls the "trompe-l'oreille" effect, which Ligeti himself describes as " the generation of a second order of musical shapes and formal operations; that is, shapes and processes which are not brought forward directly by the players, but emerge through the coming together at an illusory level of processes deferring in configuration and speed." (ibid.) In Ligeti
we therefore see a more subtle level of intertextual discourse
Quotation,
of course, is not the only way in which intertextual
Formulae are often useful as parts of musical works, and the This "anonymous intertextuality" is a fitting term for the third movement of Dutch composer Louis Andriessen's De Materie (Matter, 1984-88), "De Stijl" ("The Style"). De Materie is an evening-long work in four parts intended for theatrical, probably semi-staged, performance in which orchestra, chorus, soloists and reciters give a sort of aural tour of the history of Holland. Throughout the work's two hours various characters from Dutch history (primarily. The French chemist Marie Curie does make an appearance in part four) appear on stage to sing or recite excerpts of their work or stories about themselves (as is the case with Piet Mondrian, who makes an appearance in the third movement, "De Stijl," but in the third person by way of a recitation of reminiscences of him by one of his friends). Throughout, the chorus serves as the voice of the people, singing at the outset an excerpt from the Act of Abjuration, in which Holland declared its independence from the Spanish crown in 1581. The chorus, however, also serves to produce a sort of "anti-narrative" by singing such "unsettable" text as instructions for building ships. Thus Andriessen creates a style which "is a synthesis of the extremes...ranging from reason versus instinct, constructivism versus spontaneity, doctrine versus entertainment, concert hall versus theater." (Schonberger, Elmer [Gatehouse, Nicoline, trans.], notes to De Materie, Nonsuch-79367-2, New York, 1996.) These extremes form the strategic formulae at the core of De Materie in general and "De Stijl" in particular (indeed of Andriessen's entire output). In "De Stijl"
Andriessen sets out to create a picture of the Dutch painter Piet Mondrian
by using the writings of one of his contemporaries, M.H.J. Schoemaekers,
on "The Principles of Plastic Mathematics," the recollections of one of
his friends and a structure based
This obvious
stylistic reference to the music of J.S. Bach, one of Andriessen's musical
heroes, is further expanded by Andriessen's use of the B-A-C-H motif,
found in many of J.S. Bach's works, as a representation of Schoenmaekers'
"cross-figure" theory which influenced Mondrian's work so heavily (this
motive is also used in De Materie's second movement,
These are
only a handful of examples which support the notion of intertextuality
in contemporary music. In recent years composers have used it purposefully
in order to create specific moods or narratives. Composers have also
been unconscious or subversive of such formulae. The musical landscape
remains as fertile as in the nineteenth century when Robert
Discography
Andriessen, Louis, De Materie, Asko and Schoenberg ensembles, Netherlands
Bryars, Gavin, Jesus' Blood Never Failed Me Yet, Michael Riesman,
Bryars, Gavin, The Sinking of the Titanic, Gavin Bryars, producer, Point
Hatten, Robert, "The Place of Intertextuality in Music Studies," American
Ligeti, Gyorgy, "Trio fur Violine, Horn und Klavier/Passacaglia
A Composer’s
Guide to Wedding Music
I recently
married a wonderful woman in a beautiful and surprisingly glitch-free ceremony.
When my wife and I first started planning our wedding we divvied up the
tasks that each of us would handle. I was not unhappy when she decided
to take care of most of the details herself--and left me with a single
assignment--the music . Though my wife is herself a musician, she
understands that I am perhaps the most finicky kind of musician of them
all--a composer. And not just a passive, keep-my-opinions-to-myself
kind of composer (do those even exist?), but one with lots of opinions.
No. 1: Keep it tasteful. Actually, this is the only rule you really need to follow. All other rules are simply variations of this rule. Unless you're a personal friend of Weird Al Yankovic or sing in a barber shop quartet or all your friends are accordian players, you might want to keep your private tastes private. No. 2: Keep it small. Yes, there is such a thing as too big when it comes to the musicians at a wedding ceremony. This, of course, is a matter of taste, depending on the pieces chosen, so refer to rule no. 1. The Basie Band is great but 17 musicians in a small hall put a damper on conversation No. 3: No Mendelssohn or Wagner! Queen Victoria’s little tradition has worn thin. If you don’t want your wedding to seem stuffily conservative, avoid these old wedding war horses. Trust me. By the same token, Pachelbel’s Canon in D is out too. Musicians especially hate that one. So if you insist on using it expect to pay them extra. It’s the nice thing to do. No. 4: No bad pop music. I’m sure Bryan Adams’ “Everything I do I do it for You” seems like an appropriate choice for the mid-ceremony song. It’s not. It’s corny and trashy. Then again, so is Schubert’s "Ave Maria” after years of usage. So, once again, refer to rule no. 1. We used Schumann’s “Widmung, op. 25, no. 1.” It’s a song both my wife and I loved and which had a text that was very appropriate to how we felt about each other. Tastes vary, of course, but if you do a little research you can find plenty of musical gems that would enhance the ceremony and seem fresh and new. No. 5: Pick meaningful music. Choose pieces for your ceremony that hold special meaning to you and/or members of your family. I’ve already mentioned Schumann’s “Widmung.” We also used Beethoven’s “Heiliger Dankesang” from the a minor string quartet as the first processional because it is a piece I particularly love and have loved for a long time. For the bride’s processional (we used separate pieces for the wedding party and for the bride. This is not necessarily a tradition but it’s a practice that I’ve found worked beautifully, both in our wedding and in other weddings we’ve attended recently) we used the “Air on the G string” from J.S. Bach’s Third Overture. I chose this as a tribute to my mother because it is her favorite piece of classical music. For the recessional I arranged a dance from Michael Praetorius’ Terpsichore, a collection of courtly dances from 1612. Praetorius has been a significant composer to me recently and one of our first dates was hearing a performance of Praetorius’ Christmas music. One of my first ideas was to write at least one of the pieces for the ceremony but, in the end, I decided not to. Getting married is nervewracking enough without wondering how a piece of new music is going to go over. I ended up contributing an arrangement rather than an original composition. One last rule: Have fun. I found picking music and bouncing ideas off my wife for pieces to be a very fun process. Make sure to enjoy it. After all, you get to listen to a lot of music in the process. Rules one and five are the most important. The others really depend on your taste. If you follow
this advice the result will be a beautiful and meaningful ceremony that
you will remember your entire lives.
ARMANDO
BAYOLO, born in Santurce, Puerto Rico, began studying the
|