Archive for February, 2006

I’m in the midst of memorizing two new concerti (Lowell Liebermann’s and Billy Joel’s) and realize that after practicing on my main piano at home, it has somewhat become a comfortable situation. I am accustomed to the location of the instrument, the sound, and how everything feels around its location. As soon as I went to the other piano adjacent to the one I’ve been studying with, all of a sudden, the familiarity of the instrument and the environment of where it is placed had been lost. As I would play through the pieces on other instruments, I found myself hearing and seeing things differently, which I believe is part of the ‘memorization’ of the music.

I think it is a useful practice for all instrumentalists (with their own instruments or other instruments) to become acquainted with studying new music in various locations to help solidify the memorization process. Everything just feels different when one changes the location and/or the instrument. This can be a very interesting way for orchestral players to redefine their audition material. Practice in different rooms of your home, or wherever. You’ll find that the sound and location will be different, which can indeed have an effect on your playing. For pianists, the different instruments have varying touch and sound, so it is very helpful to do this.

Comments No Comments »

The following is an excerpted letter re-printed in the Los Angeles Times. I was deeply moved by Mark Swed’s article on February 5th in the LA Times and sent him a personal letter. The editor’s asked if I wouldn’t mind if they decided to print some of the letter. Here is it:

February 12, 2006

A pianistic passion

MARK SWED’S article regarding the “Appassionata” is magnificent ["Appassionata Unleashed," Feb. 5]. I was born deaf, and after surgery at age 3, I gravitated to the piano. When I was 5 or 6, my first recording was that of the great Horowitz – Beethoven’s “Appassionata” with the D-major sonata, Opus 10, No. 3. Even then, I knew the star of the LP was the “Appassionata.” I said, “I want to do this.”

The other great pianist, Rubinstein, also played the “Appassionata.” Horowitz and Rubinstein – their names always went together. Who was the poet, who was the pianistic genius? For me, they were one and the same.

Why the “Appassionata”? It was the essential piece in the pianist’s repertoire. It was Beethoven at his best – fire, passion, lyricism, spirituality, the religious slow movement with its variations on a chorale, and the tempestuous last movement. It was indeed the “Appassionata” that Horowitz recorded in the 1960s to set a benchmark for pianists – and it did.

It is fantastic to see this sonata coming back into pianistic vogue. It is thrilling to see young pianists wishing to devour its passion and fury.

JEFFREY BIEGEL

Lynbrook, N.Y.

Comments No Comments »