Composer/keyboardist/producer Elodie Lauten creates operas, music for dance and theatre, orchestral, chamber and instrumental music. Not a household name, she is however widely recognized by historians as a leading figure of post-minimalism and a force on the new music scene, with 20 releases on a number of labels.
Her opera Waking in New York, Portrait of Allen Ginsberg was presented by the New York City Opera (2004 VOX and Friends) in May 2004, after being released on 4Tay, following three well-received productions. OrfReo, a new opera for Baroque ensemble was premiered at Merkin Hall by the Queen's Chamber Band, whose New Music Alive CD (released on Capstone in 2004) includes Lauten's The Architect. The Orfreo CD was released in December 2004 on Studio 21. In September 2004 Lauten was composer-in-residence at Hope College, MI. Lauten's Symphony 2001, was premiered in February 2003 by the SEM Orchestra in New York. In 1999, Lauten's Deus ex Machina Cycle for voices and Baroque ensemble (4Tay) received strong critical acclaim in the US and Europe. Lauten's Variations On The Orange Cycle (Lovely Music, 1998) was included in Chamber Music America's list of 100 best works of the 20th century.
Born in Paris, France, she was classically trained as a pianist since age 7. She received a Master's in composition from New York University where she studied Western composition with Dinu Ghezzo and Indian classical music with Ahkmal Parwez. Daughter of jazz pianist/drummer Errol Parker, she is also a fluent improviser. She became an American citizen in 1984 and has lived in New York since the early seventies
|
|
|
|
|
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Strange Wisdom
Happy Holidays to all. I feel that the issues we are facing right now as composers are so overwhelming as well as exciting and disturbing, that I am introducing Strange Wisdom, an interactive reality forum that focuses more on how people feel about what is happening and what their own reactions are, rational or not. You may use a pseudonym to protect your privacy. Email Strange Wisdom with a question, issue, discussion topic: elauten@yahoo.com, or post your comments.
*****************
Paul: At the movies, my friend remarks: the credit music sounds kind of like a piece of yours, doesn’t it? I heard it too. It is really, really close to a piece I wrote some years back and released on CD. What shoudl I do about that? I have a lawyer friend, so I call him and explain; I buy the soundtrack for the film (an award-winning picture), find the section that sounds like my piece, and I put both on a CD for my lawyer to listen to – he is not particularly musically inclined, but that’s a good test. He agrees that it sounds similar. He sends a letter to the record label, hoping to get at least some credit and maybe a little cash for the sampling or imitation. It takes a long time, but they get back to us with a letter from a musicologist who analyzed the two pieces and pointed out that there is some minor degree of difference between the tracks (one note on the modal scale). We drop the case – hiring another musicologist to prove otherwise by pointing out all the similarities, which I am sure could have been done, is not in the budget. However, I still don’t think that was a fair resolution. Time and time again, my music and/or musical concepts are plundered and used for other people’s profit while I am continually struggling.
Strange Wisdom: I know, Paul, it really sounds like exploitation, doesn’t it? But thinking in those terms – which I have done myself occasionally – only leads to conflict and despair. I order to maintain my peace of mind, I have to try and think otherwise. I am sorry to say, you may have to be content that your music was attractive enough to be plundered…and we may all soon have to give up individual ownership of our music. The new trend is to create pieces collectively while exchanging the materials on the internet: one person starts the piece, sends it out into the world, another person uses that draft and adds to it, transforms it, sends it out, and so on, so forth until the piece becomes a kind of evolving creation that none/all of the participants can call their own. Music-making is now free from the tyranny of the single composer, or, being a composer has become so popular that nearly everyone wants to do it - and is enabled to do so because new technology makes it accessible without years of training. This could make us ‘individual’ composers of the past. It’s like giving up the ego for the second time. Being a composer in the traditional sense already entails so much giving up of the ego, in dealing with performers, institutions, media, etc., but this is about giving up the very identity of composer. It seems that our identities, initially reinforced by the internet through web visibility, ultimately get lost in the process. Of course, you can copyright your material until doomsday but that will accomplish nothing unless you have thousands of dollars to invest in a battle for ownership. I’d rather spend the money on recording another piece!
*****************
Alison: The use of peer panels reflects the system’s maintenance of the status quo. There is an inherent conflict of interest in having a competitor judge my work. I’d just as soon accept a lottery system.
Strange Wisdom: I agree, it is essentially a faulty system, and you are utterly frustrated, but if you can actually send out A LOT of submissions, usually something comes back – call it luck or the law of averages or whatever. The only real problem is the amount of time required to prepare and send out grant submissions. I always have a toss-up between the time I would spend on the grant submission and time to actually work on a piece. If I can get a job, I use my own money for funding my projects – sometimes they have to be put off for a while until I have a block of time available to focus on the music. This definitely affects my productivity, but quantity is not necessarily quality. During the fallow periods I do more thinking and develop new ideas that will come into play in later work. That’s a more organic process, like during the winter the earth rests, for a flowering in the spring and summer. So my advice is, use the fallow times to refresh and renew and wait for the next break to occur – and it does, when you manifest faith. I was nearly in tears when I read in an article by Belinda Reynolds on Newmusicbox that in a church venue the musicians shared the proceeds with the homeless… that’s what we are essentially, homeless with a home, not far from what the Japanese call Kawarakojiki, beggar-artists.
*****************
Michael: Everyone seems to lament the demise of Tower Records. On the other hand, throughout the 20-some years they have been selling my CDs, I haven’t seen a penny come back to me from Tower since New Music Distribution Service closed back in the 80s. What a friend of mine used to do is go there and surreptitiously put his own CDs in the bin so that they would be available. That might have been actually easier – and cheaper, no shipping - than going through the cumbersome process of distribution, while the return on investment would have been the same!
Strange Wisdom: I can relate to what you are saying. The industry has changed. The distribution of CDs is going to be virtual. I have some inkling that setting up a web site where people can purchase the music directly from the composer could be the ideal solution. The problem with distribution has always been the middle men who pocket all the money along the way. However, there are a lot of internet middle men nowadays, and I am somewhat leery of them. I believe that you have to be the legal and sole owner of your music, and your own publisher, if at all possible. Then you can turn the tables and be master of your own game – on whatever scale that may be, or decide not to sell your music, which is also an option. It is neither difficult nor expensive to set up a payment system through PayPal or other similar hosts. So why not go direct, paying special attention to the links.
posted by Elodie Lauten
11:06 AM
| |
